From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Prepare for in-kernel VFIO DMA operations acceleration Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:20:29 +1000 Message-ID: <5391094D.7090104@ozlabs.ru> References: <1401953144-19186-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <53905B14.5020204@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Gleb Natapov , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Graf , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53905B14.5020204@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 06/05/2014 09:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 05.06.14 09:25, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> This reserves 2 capability numbers. >> >> This implements an extended version of KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_64 ioctl. >> >> Please advise how to proceed with these patches as I suspect that >> first two should go via Paolo's tree while the last one via Alex Graf's tree >> (correct?). > > They would just go via my tree, but only be actually allocated (read: > mergable to qemu) when they hit Paolo's tree. > > In fact, I don't think it makes sense to split them off at all. So? Are these patches going anywhere? Thanks. -- Alexey