From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: nVMX: Small fixes improving emulation accuracy
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:33:20 +0200
Message-ID: <539ED600.5090700@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1402841929.git.jan.kiszka@web.de> <539ECAA9.9090204@redhat.com> <539ED419.9000705@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24422 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751635AbaFPLd1 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:33:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <539ED419.9000705@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 16/06/2014 13:25, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> >
>> > If you reorder the first three patches as 2 then 3 then 1, you do not
>> > need to temporarily break CR3 access interception.  There is no
>> > conflict, just changes in the context.  Does that look good to you?
> Fine with me, but I guess I should adjust some commit message(s)
> accordingly. Resend?
>

Yes, please.

Paolo