Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 18.06.2014 12:48, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:44:11AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 17/06/2014 11:03, David Marchand ha scritto:
>>>> Unless someone steps up and maintains ivshmem, I think it
>>>> should be deprecated and dropped from QEMU.
>>> 
>>> Then I can maintain ivshmem for QEMU. If this is ok, I will
>>> send a patch for MAINTAINERS file.
>> 
>> Typically, adding yourself to maintainers is done only after
>> having proved your ability to be a maintainer. :)
>> 
>> So, let's stop talking and go back to code!  You can start doing
>> what was suggested elsewhere in the thread: get the server and
>> uio driver merged into the QEMU tree, document the protocol in
>> docs/specs/ivshmem_device_spec.txt, and start fixing bugs such as
>> the ones that Markus reported.
> 
> One more thing to add to the list:
> 
> static void ivshmem_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t * buf, int
> flags)
> 
> The "flags" argument should be "size".  Size should be checked
> before accessing buf.
> 
> Please also see the bug fixes in the following unapplied patch: 
> "[PATCH] ivshmem: fix potential OOB r/w access (#2)" by Sebastian
> Krahmer 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg03538.html

Jumping
> 
late onto this thread: SUSE Security team has just recently
done a thorough review of QEMU ivshmem code because a customer has
requested this be supported in SLES12. Multiple security-related
patches were submitted by Stefan Hajnoczi and Sebastian Krahmer, and I
fear they are probably still not merged for lack of active
maintainer... In such cases, after review, I expect them to be picked
up by Peter as committer or via qemu-trivial.

So -1, against dropping it.

Vincent, you will find an RFC for an ivshmem-test in the qemu-devel
list archives or possibly on my qtest branch. The blocking issue that
I haven't worked on yet is that we can't unconditionally run the qtest
because it depends on KVM enabled at configure time (as opposed to
runtime) to have the device available.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/336367/

As others have stated before, the nahanni server seems unmaintained,
thus not getting packaged by SUSE either and making testing the
interrupt parts of ivshmem difficult - unless we sort out and fill
with actual test code my proposed qtest.

Regards,
Andreas

- -- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=MtPH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----