* status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM
@ 2014-06-21 8:55 Xuekun Hu
2014-06-21 12:58 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuekun Hu @ 2014-06-21 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, riel
Hi, Rik
I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
(http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
Many thanks.
Thx, Xuekun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM
2014-06-21 8:55 status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM Xuekun Hu
@ 2014-06-21 12:58 ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 1:18 ` Xuekun Hu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2014-06-21 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xuekun Hu, kvm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2014 04:55 AM, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> Hi, Rik
>
> I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
> (http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
>
>
You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
> Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
I have gotten side-tracked by the automatic NUMA balancing work,
but Michael Tsirkin has been doing some work on reducing idle
latencies.
- --
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTpYFnAAoJEM553pKExN6DcDcH/1UlBofa3KmGaercqfBk19Sj
78T8JgiAog4WBanFn3znVqbvdu1icMztVdUw/CoqVwgyeRmgyfXt5uf1lHtCe7zx
HS/BDIAYJSXt0uXPd7bBUThFdTLusL/VSf7WBV6ex3Qcw8qywBooS2VdA4wYP8t4
oMclOSR6imjhwSPYLP+723duzYowu35wXC1Fojhrm1AidAbLSIiClVGrDtkFjp5p
iuM+J6hHDPH3E/hwSWYE8EBeOC5CrvhmMdguv+7R4Z5qI9Qz+K6Ol8U1P33BcDfL
IXMoW/76UUEwmK3BOjTvYFUYJTUb94znY/e3q3zK1UZCoIpMqUyUjLUNiEZKjXc=
=rmno
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM
2014-06-21 12:58 ` Rik van Riel
@ 2014-06-23 1:18 ` Xuekun Hu
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuekun Hu @ 2014-06-23 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel, mst; +Cc: kvm
Thanks, Rik
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/21/2014 04:55 AM, Xuekun Hu wrote:
>> Hi, Rik
>>
>> I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
>> (http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
>>
>>
> You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
>> Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
>
> I have gotten side-tracked by the automatic NUMA balancing work,
> but Michael Tsirkin has been doing some work on reducing idle
> latencies.
>
Michael, may I know your status of the work on reducing idle latencies?
Many thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM
2014-06-23 1:18 ` Xuekun Hu
@ 2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2014-06-23 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xuekun Hu; +Cc: Rik van Riel, kvm
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:18:33AM +0800, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> Thanks, Rik
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 06/21/2014 04:55 AM, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> >> Hi, Rik
> >>
> >> I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
> >> (http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
> >>
> >>
> > You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
> >> Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
> >
> > I have gotten side-tracked by the automatic NUMA balancing work,
> > but Michael Tsirkin has been doing some work on reducing idle
> > latencies.
> >
> Michael, may I know your status of the work on reducing idle latencies?
> Many thanks.
I have a prototype - still working on it.
Would you be interested in testing?
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-23 7:54 ` Xuekun Hu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2014-06-23 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xuekun Hu; +Cc: Rik van Riel, kvm
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:08:02AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:18:33AM +0800, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> > Thanks, Rik
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 06/21/2014 04:55 AM, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> > >> Hi, Rik
> > >>
> > >> I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
> > >> (http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
> > >>
> > >>
> > > You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
> > >> Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
> > >
> > > I have gotten side-tracked by the automatic NUMA balancing work,
> > > but Michael Tsirkin has been doing some work on reducing idle
> > > latencies.
> > >
> > Michael, may I know your status of the work on reducing idle latencies?
> > Many thanks.
>
> I have a prototype - still working on it.
> Would you be interested in testing?
Pls note I was looking at a PV solution, so this is
for linux guests only at this point.
> --
> MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2014-06-23 7:54 ` Xuekun Hu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuekun Hu @ 2014-06-23 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: Rik van Riel, kvm
Yes, I would like to test. :-)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:08:02AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:18:33AM +0800, Xuekun Hu wrote:
>> > Thanks, Rik
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > > Hash: SHA1
>> > >
>> > > On 06/21/2014 04:55 AM, Xuekun Hu wrote:
>> > >> Hi, Rik
>> > >>
>> > >> I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
>> > >> (http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > > You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
>> > >> Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
>> > >
>> > > I have gotten side-tracked by the automatic NUMA balancing work,
>> > > but Michael Tsirkin has been doing some work on reducing idle
>> > > latencies.
>> > >
>> > Michael, may I know your status of the work on reducing idle latencies?
>> > Many thanks.
>>
>> I have a prototype - still working on it.
>> Would you be interested in testing?
>
> Pls note I was looking at a PV solution, so this is
> for linux guests only at this point.
>
>> --
>> MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-23 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-21 8:55 status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM Xuekun Hu
2014-06-21 12:58 ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-23 1:18 ` Xuekun Hu
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-23 7:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-23 7:54 ` Xuekun Hu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox