From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Prepare for in-kernel VFIO DMA operations acceleration Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:59:22 +1000 Message-ID: <53AB625A.5040305@ozlabs.ru> References: <1401953144-19186-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <53905B14.5020204@suse.de> <5391094D.7090104@ozlabs.ru> <53AB3B28.3040708@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Gleb Natapov , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Graf , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53AB3B28.3040708@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 06/26/2014 07:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 06.06.14 02:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 06/05/2014 09:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> On 05.06.14 09:25, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> This reserves 2 capability numbers. >>>> >>>> This implements an extended version of KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_64 ioctl. >>>> >>>> Please advise how to proceed with these patches as I suspect that >>>> first two should go via Paolo's tree while the last one via Alex Graf's >>>> tree >>>> (correct?). >>> They would just go via my tree, but only be actually allocated (read: >>> mergable to qemu) when they hit Paolo's tree. >>> >>> In fact, I don't think it makes sense to split them off at all. >> >> So? Are these patches going anywhere? Thanks. > > So? Are you going to address the comments? Sorry, I cannot find here anything to fix. Ben asked some questions, I answered and there were no objections. What do I miss this time?... -- Alexey