From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6 v2] KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE/FP exit handling
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:21:52 +0200
Message-ID: <53B54AE0.5070104@suse.de>
References: <1404142497-6430-1-git-send-email-mihai.caraman@freescale.com> <1404142497-6430-3-git-send-email-mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
To: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1404142497-6430-3-git-send-email-mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org


On 30.06.14 17:34, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> SPE/FP/AltiVec interrupts share the same numbers. Refactor SPE/FP exit handling
> to accommodate AltiVec later on the same flow. Add kvmppc_supports_spe() to detect
> suport for the unit at runtime since it can be configured in the kernel but not
> featured on hardware and vice versa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>

Why not keep them 100% separate?


Alex