From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Hu Robert <robert.hu@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix IRQs inject to L2 which belong to L1 since race
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:21:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B6560F.40309@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140704061701.GB3453@kernel>
On 2014-07-04 08:17, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:15:26AM -0400, Bandan Das wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2014-07-02 08:54, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>>> This patch fix bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72381
>>>>
>>>> If we didn't inject a still-pending event to L1 since nested_run_pending,
>>>> KVM_REQ_EVENT should be requested after the vmexit in order to inject the
>>>> event to L1. However, current log blindly request a KVM_REQ_EVENT even if
>>>> there is no still-pending event to L1 which blocked by nested_run_pending.
>>>> There is a race which lead to an interrupt will be injected to L2 which
>>>> belong to L1 if L0 send an interrupt to L1 during this window.
>>>>
>>>> VCPU0 another thread
>>>>
>>>> L1 intr not blocked on L2 first entry
>>>> vmx_vcpu_run req event
>>>> kvm check request req event
>>>> check_nested_events don't have any intr
>>>> not nested exit
>>>> intr occur (8254, lapic timer etc)
>>>> inject_pending_event now have intr
>>>> inject interrupt
>>>>
>>>> This patch fix this race by introduced a l1_events_blocked field in nested_vmx
>>>> which indicates there is still-pending event which blocked by nested_run_pending,
>>>> and smart request a KVM_REQ_EVENT if there is a still-pending event which blocked
>>>> by nested_run_pending.
>>>
>>> There are more, unrelated reasons why KVM_REQ_EVENT could be set. Why
>>> aren't those able to trigger this scenario?
>>>
>>> In any case, unconditionally setting KVM_REQ_EVENT seems strange and
>>> should be changed.
>>
>>
>> Ugh! I think I am hitting another one but this one's probably because
>> we are not setting KVM_REQ_EVENT for something we should.
>>
>> Before this patch, I was able to hit this bug everytime with
>> "modprobe kvm_intel ept=0 nested=1 enable_shadow_vmcs=0" and then booting
>> L2. I can verify that I was indeed hitting the race in inject_pending_event.
>>
>> After this patch, I believe I am hitting another bug - this happens
>> after I boot L2, as above, and then start a Linux kernel compilation
>> and then wait and watch :) It's a pain to debug because this happens
>> almost once in three times; it never happens if I run with ept=1, however,
>> I think that's only because the test completes sooner. But I can confirm
>> that I don't see it if I always set REQ_EVENT if nested_run_pending is set instead of
>> the approach this patch takes.
>> (Any debug hints help appreciated!)
>>
>> So, I am not sure if this is the right fix. Rather, I think the safer thing
>> to do is to have the interrupt pending check for injection into L1 at
>> the "same site" as the call to kvm_queue_interrupt() just like we had before
>> commit b6b8a1451fc40412c57d1. Is there any advantage to having all the
>> nested events checks together ?
>>
>
> How about revert commit b6b8a1451 and try if the bug which you mentioned
> is still there?
I suspect you will have to reset back to b6b8a1451^ for this as other
changes depend on this commit now.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-04 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 6:54 [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix IRQs inject to L2 which belong to L1 since race Wanpeng Li
2014-07-02 7:20 ` Hu, Robert
2014-07-02 9:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-02 9:13 ` Hu, Robert
2014-07-02 9:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-02 9:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-03 2:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-03 5:15 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-03 6:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-03 17:27 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-04 2:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-04 5:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-04 6:08 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-04 7:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-04 7:39 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-04 7:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 7:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-04 8:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 8:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-04 7:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 9:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-04 9:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 10:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-04 11:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-04 11:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 11:46 ` [PATCH] Add -mno-red-zone to CFLAGS for x86-64 Jan Kiszka
2014-07-04 11:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-04 6:17 ` [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Fix IRQs inject to L2 which belong to L1 since race Wanpeng Li
2014-07-04 7:21 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2014-07-07 0:56 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-07 8:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-07 13:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 17:31 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-07 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 17:38 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-07 23:14 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-08 4:35 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-07 23:38 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-08 5:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-02 16:27 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-03 5:11 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-07-03 5:29 ` Bandan Das
2014-07-03 7:33 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B6560F.40309@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox