From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/17] Introduce alloc_ops
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:40:42 +0200
Message-ID: <53BFA30A.6040602@redhat.com>
References: <1405066787-5793-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> <1405066787-5793-7-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7756 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751469AbaGKIks (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:40:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1405066787-5793-7-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 11/07/2014 10:19, Andrew Jones ha scritto:
> alloc_ops provide interfaces for alloc(), free() and friends, allowing
> unit tests and common code to use dynamic memory allocation.
> arch-specific code must provide the implementations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/alloc.c |  2 ++
>  lib/alloc.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/alloc.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/alloc.h
>
> diff --git a/lib/alloc.c b/lib/alloc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..868664b4dcaa3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/alloc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +#include "alloc.h"
> +struct alloc_ops alloc_ops;
> diff --git a/lib/alloc.h b/lib/alloc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..c8cd61b387a9a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/alloc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +#ifndef _ALLOC_H_
> +#define _ALLOC_H_
> +#include "libcflat.h"
> +
> +struct alloc_ops {
> +	void *(*alloc)(size_t size);
> +	void *(*alloc_aligned)(size_t size, size_t align);
> +	void (*free)(const void *addr);
> +};
> +
> +extern struct alloc_ops alloc_ops;
> +
> +static inline void *alloc(size_t size)
> +{
> +	assert(alloc_ops.alloc);
> +	return alloc_ops.alloc(size);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void *alloc_aligned(size_t size, size_t align)
> +{
> +	assert(alloc_ops.alloc_aligned);
> +	return alloc_ops.alloc_aligned(size, align);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void free(const void *addr)
> +{
> +	assert(alloc_ops.free);
> +	alloc_ops.free(addr);
> +}
> +
> +#endif
>

Why do you need the wrappers?  Could you just have lib/malloc.c define 
the three functions, with interface in lib/stdlib.h and lib/memregion.h?

Also, please call them with the "right" C names:

        void *malloc(size_t size);
        void free(void *ptr);
        void *calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size);
        void *memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size);

Only calloc should do the memset.

Later, x86 could also add a memregion_init call and be able to use 
malloc/free.

Paolo