From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/17] Introduce alloc_ops Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:12:40 +0200 Message-ID: <53BFB898.7050309@redhat.com> References: <1405066787-5793-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> <1405066787-5793-7-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> <53BFA30A.6040602@redhat.com> <20140711085529.GA6013@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> <53BFB14E.6010900@redhat.com> <20140711100725.GE6013@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org To: Andrew Jones Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36938 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911AbaGKKMq (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 06:12:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140711100725.GE6013@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Il 11/07/2014 12:07, Andrew Jones ha scritto: > Yes, you are correct, and I like your design and API better, but with one > change. We should introduce phys_addr_t=u64 to common code as well, and then > use that instead of uintptr_t/size_t. I'll do this for v7. Of course. Paolo