From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] KVM: s390: Let user space control the cpu states
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:49:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C933EB.9020707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405430875-40722-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Il 15/07/2014 15:27, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> Paolo,
>
> The following changes since commit 9f6226a762c7ae02f6a23a3d4fc552dafa57ea23:
>
> arch: x86: kvm: x86.c: Cleaning up variable is set more than once (2014-06-30 16:52:04 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/kvm-s390-20140715
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 6352e4d2dd9a349024a41356148eced553e1dce4:
>
> KVM: s390: implement KVM_(S|G)ET_MP_STATE for user space state control (2014-07-10 14:11:17 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This series enables the "KVM_(S|G)ET_MP_STATE" ioctls on s390 to make
> the cpu state settable by user space.
>
> This is necessary to avoid races in s390 SIGP/reset handling which
> happen because some SIGPs are handled in QEMU, while others are
> handled in the kernel. Together with the busy conditions as return
> value of SIGP races happen especially in areas like starting and
> stopping of CPUs. (For example, there is a program 'cpuplugd', that
> runs on several s390 distros which does automatic onlining and
> offlining on cpus.)
>
> As soon as the MPSTATE interface is used, user space takes complete
> control of the cpu states. Otherwise the kernel will use the old way.
>
> Therefore, the new kernel continues to work fine with old QEMUs.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> David Hildenbrand (5):
> KVM: s390: allow only one SIGP STOP (AND STORE STATUS) at a time
> KVM: s390: move finalization of SIGP STOP orders to kvm_s390_vcpu_stop
> KVM: s390: remove __cpu_is_stopped and expose is_vcpu_stopped
> KVM: prepare for KVM_(S|G)ET_MP_STATE on other architectures
> KVM: s390: implement KVM_(S|G)ET_MP_STATE for user space state control
>
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++---------
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/diag.c | 3 ++-
> arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 32 ++++++++++--------------
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 10 ++++++--
> arch/s390/kvm/sigp.c | 7 +++++-
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 7 +++++-
> 8 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
Alex, wdyt about this patch series? Does it make sense to use
KVM_GET/SET_MP_STATE or should the one-reg interface be a better match?
It's a bit weird that running and halted map to the same mp_state on
s390. I would be more confident that KVM_GET/SET_MP_STATE is the right
choice if it had at least the KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE and
KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED. Christian, where is the halted state stored, is it
in the PSW?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 13:27 [GIT PULL 0/5] KVM: s390: Let user space control the cpu states Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-15 13:27 ` [GIT PULL 1/5] KVM: s390: allow only one SIGP STOP (AND STORE STATUS) at a time Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-15 13:27 ` [GIT PULL 2/5] KVM: s390: move finalization of SIGP STOP orders to kvm_s390_vcpu_stop Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-15 13:27 ` [GIT PULL 3/5] KVM: s390: remove __cpu_is_stopped and expose is_vcpu_stopped Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-15 13:27 ` [GIT PULL 4/5] KVM: prepare for KVM_(S|G)ET_MP_STATE on other architectures Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-15 13:27 ` [GIT PULL 5/5] KVM: s390: implement KVM_(S|G)ET_MP_STATE for user space state control Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-18 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-07-21 7:47 ` [GIT PULL 0/5] KVM: s390: Let user space control the cpu states Christian Borntraeger
2014-07-21 9:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C933EB.9020707@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox