Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] KVM: s390: Let user space control the cpu states

Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-21T09:46:32Z

Il 21/07/2014 09:47, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> So having such a state wont buy us much. It would be even wrong, because
> we want our MP_STATE defines to be a 1:1 match of the states that are defined
> in the architecture as proper CPU states. Some of the SIGP calls will return the
> state of the target CPU and that depends on the CPU state as defined in the
> architecture. The wait bit does not have an influence on the return value.

Thanks for the explanation.

Paolo