Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] random: Add and use arch_get_rng_seed

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

On 07/22/2014 02:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> On 07/22/2014 02:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to check: do you mean the RDRAND is very likely to work (i.e.
>>> arch_get_random_long will return true) or that RDRAND will actually
>>> reseed several times during initialization?
>>>
>>
>> I mean that RDRAND will actually reseed several times during
>> initialization.  The documented architectural limit is actually
>> extremely conservative.
>>
>> Either way, it isn't really different from seeding from a VM hosts
>> /dev/urandom...
> 
> Sure it is.  The VM host's /dev/urandom makes no guarantee (or AFAIK
> even any particular effort) to reseed such that the output has some
> minimum entropy per bit, so there would be no point to reading extra
> data from it.

Depends on what you define as "extra data".  If the data pulled is less
than the size of the output pool, it *may* be fully entropic.

(Fun fact: it may even have been fully entropic at the time you pull it,
but then turn out not to be later because *another* process consumed
data from /dev/urandom without adequate reseeding.)

> Anyway, I'd be willing to drop the conservative RDRAND logic, but I
> *still* think that arch_get_rng_seed is a much better interface than
> arch_get_slow_rng_u64.

That I will leave up to you and Ted.

	-hpa