From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>, gleb@kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/kvm: Resolve some missing-initializers warnings
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:04:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D2640B.80600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406294825-21393-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Il 25/07/2014 15:27, Jeff Kirsher ha scritto:
> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
>
> Resolve some missing-initializers warnings that appear in W=2
> builds. They are resolved by using a designated initialization,
> which is enough to resolve the warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index ef432f8..6d0f47208 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)(EFER_SCE | EFER_LME | EFER_LMA));
> static u64 __read_mostly efer_reserved_bits = ~((u64)EFER_SCE);
> #endif
>
> -#define VM_STAT(x) offsetof(struct kvm, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VM
> -#define VCPU_STAT(x) offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VCPU
> +#define VM_STAT(x) .offset = offsetof(struct kvm, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VM
> +#define VCPU_STAT(x) .offset = offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VCPU
>
> static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> static void process_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
This is really ugly. Either add the missing initializer (it's just a
NULL) or, better, move the name into VM_STAT/VCPU_STAT and add the
missing initializer to VM_STAT/VCPU_STAT.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 13:27 [PATCH 1/4] x86/kvm: Resolve some missing-initializers warnings Jeff Kirsher
2014-07-25 13:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm: Resolve missing-field-initializers warnings Jeff Kirsher
2014-07-25 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-25 13:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/kvm: Resolve shadow warnings in macro expansion Jeff Kirsher
2014-07-25 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-25 17:18 ` Rustad, Mark D
2014-07-26 7:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-30 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 " Mark D Rustad
2014-07-31 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-31 16:59 ` [PATCH V3 " Mark D Rustad
2014-07-25 13:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/kvm: Resolve shadow warning from min macro Jeff Kirsher
2014-07-25 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-25 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-07-30 21:18 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] x86/kvm: Resolve some missing-initializers warnings Mark D Rustad
2014-07-31 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-31 16:35 ` Rustad, Mark D
2014-07-31 16:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D2640B.80600@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.d.rustad@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox