From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhangjie (HZ)" Subject: Re: Query: Is it possible to lose interrupts between vhost and virtio_net during migration? Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 20:14:28 +0800 Message-ID: <53E0CAA4.8010303@huawei.com> References: <53DA2CCC.1040606@huawei.com> <20140731143100.GA3834@redhat.com> <20140731143725.GA3875@redhat.com> <53DB705F.2000405@redhat.com> <53DB76A9.8010305@redhat.com> <53E079C8.7050700@huawei.com> <20140805094957.GB24619@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jason Wang , , , , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140805094957.GB24619@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2014/8/5 17:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0800, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote: >> Jason is right, the new order is not the cause of network unreachable. >> Changing order seems not work. After about 40 times, the problem occurs again. >> Maybe there is other hidden reasons for that. I modified the code to change the order myself yesterday. This result is about my code. > > To make sure, you tested the patch that I posted to list: > "vhost_net: stop guest notifiers after backend"? > > Please confirm. > OK, I will test with your patch "vhost_net: stop guest notifiers after backend". -- Best Wishes! Zhang Jie