From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: check ISR and TMR to construct eoi exit bitmap
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:24:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53E46D14.5000703@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407477745-15743-1-git-send-email-yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
On 2014/8/8 14:02, Yang Zhang wrote:
> From: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
>
> Guest may mask the IOAPIC entry before issue EOI. In such case,
> EOI will not be intercepted by hypervisor due to the corrensponding
> bit in eoi exit bitmap is not setting.
>
> The solution is to check ISR + TMR to construct the EOI exit bitmap.
>
> This patch is a better fixing for the issue that commit "0f6c0a740b"
> tries to solve.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 +++++++++
> virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 7 ++++---
> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> hi, alex
>
> This patch is not tested since i don't have the environment to do it. Can you
> help to test it? thanks.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 08e8a89..d2f9a6e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@
> #define VEC_POS(v) ((v) & (32 - 1))
> #define REG_POS(v) (((v) >> 5) << 4)
>
> +static inline u32 apic_read_reg(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int reg_off)
> +{
> + return *((u32 *) (apic->regs + reg_off));
> +}
> +
I think we already define the same in the arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h file,
static inline u32 kvm_apic_get_reg(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int reg_off)
{
return *((u32 *) (apic->regs + reg_off));
}
Thanks
Tiejun
> static inline void apic_set_reg(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int reg_off, u32 val)
> {
> *((u32 *) (apic->regs + reg_off)) = val;
> @@ -515,6 +520,23 @@ static void pv_eoi_clr_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> __clear_bit(KVM_APIC_PV_EOI_PENDING, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention);
> }
>
> +void kvm_apic_zap_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap,
> + u32 *tmr)
> +{
> + u32 i, reg_off, intr_in_service[8];
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> + reg_off = 0x10 * i;
> + intr_in_service[i] = apic_read_reg(apic, APIC_ISR + reg_off) &
> + apic_read_reg(apic, APIC_TMR + reg_off);
> + if (intr_in_service[i]) {
> + *((u32 *)eoi_exit_bitmap + i) |= intr_in_service[i];
> + tmr[i] |= intr_in_service[i];
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> void kvm_apic_update_tmr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *tmr)
> {
> struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> index 6a11845..4ee3d70 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ void kvm_lapic_set_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 value);
> u64 kvm_lapic_get_base(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_apic_set_version(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> +void kvm_apic_zap_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap,
> + u32 *tmr);
> void kvm_apic_update_tmr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *tmr);
> void kvm_apic_update_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *pir);
> int kvm_apic_match_physical_addr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u16 dest);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 204422d..755b556 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6005,6 +6005,15 @@ static void vcpu_scan_ioapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> memset(tmr, 0, 32);
>
> kvm_ioapic_scan_entry(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap, tmr);
> + /*
> + * Guest may mask the IOAPIC entry before issue EOI. In such case,
> + * EOI will not be intercepted by hypervisor due to the corrensponding
> + * bit in eoi exit bitmap is not setting.
> + *
> + * The solution is to check ISR + TMR to construct the EOI exit bitmap.
> + */
> + kvm_apic_zap_eoi_exitmap(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap, tmr);
> +
> kvm_x86_ops->load_eoi_exitmap(vcpu, eoi_exit_bitmap);
> kvm_apic_update_tmr(vcpu, tmr);
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> index e8ce34c..2458a1d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -254,9 +254,10 @@ void kvm_ioapic_scan_entry(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap,
> spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
> for (index = 0; index < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; index++) {
> e = &ioapic->redirtbl[index];
> - if (e->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG ||
> - kvm_irq_has_notifier(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, index) ||
> - index == RTC_GSI) {
> + if (!e->fields.mask &&
> + (e->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG ||
> + kvm_irq_has_notifier(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC,
> + index) || index == RTC_GSI)) {
> if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, NULL, 0,
> e->fields.dest_id, e->fields.dest_mode)) {
> __set_bit(e->fields.vector,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-08 6:02 [PATCH] KVM: x86: check ISR and TMR to construct eoi exit bitmap Yang Zhang
2014-08-08 6:24 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-08-08 19:16 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53E46D14.5000703@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox