From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>,
gleb@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, monamagarwal123@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfd: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:06:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F21668.5090500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140818150129.GA14447@ada>
Il 18/08/2014 17:01, Andreea-Cristina Bernat ha scritto:
> The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers.
> According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
> "1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
> it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
> smaller overhead.
>
> The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
> @@
> @@
>
> - rcu_assign_pointer
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER
> (..., NULL)
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index 20c3af7..a49130f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct _irqfd *irqfd,
> struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e;
>
> if (irqfd->gsi >= irq_rt->nr_rt_entries) {
> - rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static void irqfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct _irqfd *irqfd,
> if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
> rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, e);
> else
> - rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ kvm_irqfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
> * It is paired with synchronize_srcu done by caller
> * of that function.
> */
> - rcu_assign_pointer(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(irqfd->irq_entry, NULL);
> irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
> }
> }
>
Hi, this patch actually had been submitted already last March. It
slipped through the cracks. I'm now applying both of Monam Agarwal's
RCU_INIT_POINTER patches. Sorry. :)
Thanks,
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 15:01 [PATCH] eventfd: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER() Andreea-Cristina Bernat
2014-08-18 15:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F21668.5090500@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bernat.ada@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monamagarwal123@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox