From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Schopp Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: fix VTTBR_BADDR_MASK Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:30:58 -0500 Message-ID: <53F26282.5010103@amd.com> References: <20140811203823.2828.36074.stgit@joelaarch64.amd.com> <20140812160521.GO10550@cbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , Sungjinn Chung , Jungseok Lee To: Christoffer Dall Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1blp0181.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.181]:9415 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751903AbaHRUdb (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:33:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140812160521.GO10550@cbox> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: #endif /* __ARM_KVM_MMU_H__ */ diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c index 16e7994..70f0f02 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c @@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ int create_hyp_io_mappings(void *from, void *to, phys_addr_t phys_addr) */ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm) { + unsigned int s2_pgds, s2_pgd_order; pgd_t *pgd; if (kvm->arch.pgd != NULL) { @@ -528,10 +529,18 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm) return -EINVAL; } - pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, S2_PGD_ORDER); + s2_pgds = (1 << (kvm_get_phys_addr_shift() - PGDIR_SHIFT)); + s2_pgd_order = get_order(s2_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t)); + + pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, s2_pgd_order); if (!pgd) return -ENOMEM; + if ((unsigned long)pgd & ~vttbr_baddr_mask) { + kvm_err("Stage-2 pgd not correctly aligned: %p\n", pgd); + return -EFAULT; + } There are two problems that I've found here. The first problem is that vttbr_baddr_mask isn't allocated yet at this point in the code. The second problem is that pgd is a virtual address, ie pgd == 0xfffffe03bbb40000 while the vttbr masks off the high bits for a physical address, ie vttbr_baddr_mask=0x00007ffffffe0000 . Even correcting for those issues I haven't been able to make this check work properly. I'll resend v5 the patch with all the other suggested changes.