From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] KVM: track pid for VCPU only on KVM_RUN ioctl
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:53:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F31E9F.9020402@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F31D35.4010901@de.ibm.com>
Il 19/08/2014 11:47, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> On 19/08/14 11:27, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 19/08/2014 10:38, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
>>>>> The patch may be okay, but I'm worried that it might be
>>>>> hiding a bug in QEMU.
>>> On s390 we call "KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET" from several reset
>>> functions, e.g. during CPU creation. This is the first hickup and
>>> the pid now points to the main thread.
>>
>> Any reason to have a special ioctl instead of
>> SET_REGS/SET_ONE_REG/... (via kvm_cpu_synchronize_state, which does
>> the ioctls in the VCPU thread)?
>
> Historical reasons mostly. Older kernel miss several interfaces to
> bring the CPU in a defined state (pending interrupts, cpu state, some
> registers...)
>
> Good news is that we are working on getting rid of it: cpu states are
> now available as far as I can see, only local interrupt flushing is
> missing.This needs some more work on our side. So in some month we
> probably will have a QEMU version that does not need to call this any
> more. For todays QEMU this patch help though.
Just by the sound of it, interrupt flushing seems dangerous to do in a
way that could be concurrent with KVM_RUN...
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-05 14:44 [PATCH/RFC] KVM: track pid for VCPU only on KVM_RUN ioctl Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-07 8:21 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-08-07 9:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-07 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 8:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-07 13:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 8:38 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 9:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 9:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 9:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-08-19 9:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 10:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 10:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 10:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 11:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-08-19 12:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-08-19 14:10 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 14:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-08-19 14:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 14:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-08-18 5:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-08-19 14:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-19 23:22 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-08-20 7:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-03 13:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F31E9F.9020402@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).