From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>, gleb@kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2] x86: Test task-switch with cs.rpl != cs.dpl
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F350F3.1060206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408453449-4243-1-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
Il 19/08/2014 15:04, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
> Commit 5045b46803 added a check that cs.dpl equals cs.rpl during task-switch.
> This is a wrong check, and this patch introduces a test in which cs.dpl !=
> cs.rpl. To do so, it configures tss.cs to be conforming with rpl=3 and dpl=0.
> Since the cpl after calling is 3, it does not make any prints in the callee.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
> ---
> x86/taskswitch2.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/x86/taskswitch2.c b/x86/taskswitch2.c
> index 92fc941..1fe833e 100644
> --- a/x86/taskswitch2.c
> +++ b/x86/taskswitch2.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #define MAIN_TSS_SEL (FIRST_SPARE_SEL + 0)
> #define VM86_TSS_SEL (FIRST_SPARE_SEL + 8)
> +#define CONFORM_CS_SEL (FIRST_SPARE_SEL + 16)
>
> static volatile int test_count;
> static volatile unsigned int test_divider;
> @@ -102,6 +103,14 @@ start:
> goto start;
> }
>
> +static void user_tss(void)
> +{
> +start:
> + test_count++;
> + asm volatile ("iret");
> + goto start;
> +}
> +
> void test_kernel_mode_int()
> {
> unsigned int res;
> @@ -248,6 +257,19 @@ void test_vm86_switch(void)
> report("VM86", 1);
> }
>
> +void test_conforming_switch(void)
> +{
> + /* test lcall with conforming segment, cs.dpl != cs.rpl */
> + test_count = 0;
> + set_intr_task_gate(0, user_tss);
No need to use set_intr_task_gate, since the IDT is not involved here.
tss_intr.eip = (u32)user_tss;
is enough.
I fixed this up and applied the patch. Thanks!
Paolo
> +
> + tss_intr.cs = CONFORM_CS_SEL | 3;
> + tss_intr.ds = tss_intr.gs = tss_intr.fs = tss_intr.ss = USER_DS;
> + set_gdt_entry(CONFORM_CS_SEL, 0, 0xffffffff, 0x9f, 0xc0);
> + asm volatile("lcall $" xstr(TSS_INTR) ", $0xf4f4f4f4");
> + report("lcall with cs.rpl != cs.dpl", test_count == 1);
> +}
> +
> int main()
> {
> setup_vm();
> @@ -256,6 +278,7 @@ int main()
>
> test_kernel_mode_int();
> test_vm86_switch();
> + test_conforming_switch();
>
> return report_summary();
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 17:14 Regression problem with commit 5045b46803 Nadav Amit
2014-08-17 6:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 6:23 ` Nadav Amit
2014-08-17 6:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 7:19 ` Nadav Amit
2014-08-17 9:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 19:32 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Revert "check CS.DPL against RPL during task switch" Nadav Amit
2014-08-17 19:34 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] x86: Test task-switch with cs.rpl != cs.dpl Nadav Amit
2014-08-19 10:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 13:04 ` [PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2] " Nadav Amit
2014-08-19 13:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-08-19 13:34 ` Nadav Amit
2014-08-19 13:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 21:09 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: Revert "check CS.DPL against RPL during task switch" Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 21:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 21:33 ` Nadav Amit
2014-08-17 21:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-17 21:39 ` Nadav Amit
2014-08-17 21:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F350F3.1060206@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox