From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Dynamic Pause Loop Exiting window. Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:53:21 +0200 Message-ID: <53F62401.30708@redhat.com> References: <1408637291-18533-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <53F61EAC.2000004@redhat.com> <20140821165002.GG20453@potion.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , Raghavendra KT , Vinod Chegu , Hui-Zhi Zhao , Christian Borntraeger , Lisa Mitchell To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140821165002.GG20453@potion.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Il 21/08/2014 18:50, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 ha scritto: > 2014-08-21 18:30+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 21/08/2014 18:08, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 ha scritto: >> I'm not sure of the usefulness of patch 6, so I'm going to drop it. >> I'll keep it in my local junkyard branch in case it's going to be us= eful >> in some scenario I didn't think of. >=20 > I've been using it to benchmark different values, because it is more > convenient than reloading the module after shutting down guests. > (And easier to sell than writing to kernel memory.) >=20 > I don't think the additional code is worth it though. >=20 >> Patch 7 can be easily rebased, so no need to repost (and I might eve= n >> squash it into patch 3, what do you think?). >=20 > Yeah, the core is already a huge patch, so it does look weird without > squashing. (No-one wants to rebase to that point anyway.) Ok, my queue is a bit large so I'll probably not push to git.kernel.org= =20 until next week but in any case this is what it will look like: Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 (5): KVM: add kvm_arch_sched_in KVM: x86: introduce sched_in to kvm_x86_ops KVM: VMX: make PLE window per-VCPU <<< ple_window_dirty squashed= here KVM: VMX: dynamise PLE window KVM: trace kvm_ple_window grow/shrink Paolo