public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/15] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for next (3.18)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:26:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FC7D13.3050806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FC76A0.8060007@de.ibm.com>

Il 26/08/2014 13:59, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> This patch is more of a cleanup - making clear whats going on. Its not needed for something special.
> 
> It does two things:
> - encapsulate the TLB flushing - Yes, a function hiding that would also work. We decided to reuse an existing interface
> - serialize the TLB flushing against other control block updates. This is not necessary, it just happens as a consequence of being a request
> 
> Agreed, it will be a bit slower (instead of setting a field we now also set and test a request bit).
> Since we only need to do that in rare cases (specific control register updates via userspace and prefix setting) The performance does not matter at all.
> 
> I can take out that patch and redo the tag, or leave it in. Let me know.

You can leave it in, I just wanted to understand better.

In fact, supporting KVM_REQ_FLUSH_TLB is in general a good thing since
generic MMU notifier code refers to it.

Paolo

      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-26  8:28 [GIT PULL 00/15] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for next (3.18) Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 01/15] KVM: s390: add defines for pfault init delivery code Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 02/15] KVM: s390: factor out get_ilc() function Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 03/15] KVM: clarify the idea of kvm_dirty_regs Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 04/15] KVM: s390: clear kvm_dirty_regs when dropping to user space Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 05/15] KVM: s390: no special machine check delivery Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 06/15] KVM: s390: synchronize more registers with kvm_run Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 07/15] KVM: s390: implement KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH and make use of it Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 08/15] KVM: s390: return -EFAULT if lowcore is not mapped during irq delivery Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 09/15] KVM: s390: don't use kvm lock in interrupt injection code Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 10/15] KVM: s390/mm: readd address parameter to pgste_ipte_notify Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 11/15] KVM: s390/mm: readd address parameter to gmap_do_ipte_notify Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 12/15] KVM: s390/mm: cleanup gmap function arguments, variable names Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 13/15] KVM: s390/mm: use radix trees for guest to host mappings Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 14/15] KVM: s390/mm: support gmap page tables with less than 5 levels Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26  8:28 ` [GIT PULL 15/15] KVM: s390/mm: remove outdated gmap data structures Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26 11:40 ` [GIT PULL 00/15] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for next (3.18) Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-26 11:59   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-26 12:26     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FC7D13.3050806@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox