From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] target-i386: Make most CPU models work with "enforce"
 out of the box
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:56:21 +0200
Message-ID: <53FC83F5.2090905@redhat.com>
References: <1408999550-20321-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2331 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757473AbaHZM4i (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:56:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1408999550-20321-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Il 25/08/2014 22:45, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
> 
> TCG users expect the default CPU model to contain most TCG-supported features
> (and it makes sense). See, for example, commit
> f1e00a9cf326acc1f2386a72525af8859852e1df.

It doesn't though (SMAP is the most egregious omission, and probably the
main reason why people use QEMU TCG these days), and it raises the
question of backwards-compatibility of qemu64---should we disable TCG
features in old machine types?  Probably yes, but we've never done that.

Paolo