From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Faults which trigger IO release the mmap_sem Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:01:31 +0200 Message-ID: <5419E89B.7020002@redhat.com> References: <1410811885-17267-1-git-send-email-andreslc@google.com> <54184078.4070505@redhat.com> <54188179.7010705@redhat.com> <54193BB2.8010500@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Sasha Levin , Jianyu Zhan , Paul Cassella , Hugh Dickins , Peter Feiner , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Il 17/09/2014 18:58, Andres Lagar-Cavilla ha scritto: > Understood. So in patch 1, would kvm_gup_retry be ... just a wrapper > around gup? That looks thin to me, and the naming of the function will > not be accurate. Depends on how you interpret "retry" ("with retry" vs. "retry after _fast"). :) My point was more to make possible future bisection easier, but I'm not going to insist. I'll queue the patch as soon as I get the required Acked-by. Paolo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org