From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't take vcpu mutex for obviously invalid vcpu
 ioctls
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:29:19 +0200
Message-ID: <5420788F.9050208@redhat.com>
References: <1411167805-2458-1-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com> <541FFEDE.9030800@redhat.com> <542027F6.4050205@de.ibm.com> <542032D4.305@redhat.com> <54207668.3030502@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <54207668.3030502@de.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Il 22/09/2014 21:20, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> "while using trinity to fuzz KVM, we noticed long stalls on invalid ioctls. Lets bail out early on invalid ioctls". or similar?

Okay.  David, can you explain how you found it so that I can make up my
mind?

Gleb and Marcelo, a fourth and fifth opinion? :)

Paolo