From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't take vcpu mutex for obviously invalid vcpu
 ioctls
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 10:23:10 +0200
Message-ID: <54212DEE.2090309@redhat.com>
References: <1411167805-2458-1-git-send-email-dmatlack@google.com> <541FFEDE.9030800@redhat.com> <542027F6.4050205@de.ibm.com> <542032D4.305@redhat.com> <54207668.3030502@de.ibm.com> <5420788F.9050208@redhat.com> <20140923064918.GE30733@minantech.com> <542129F1.1080608@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <542129F1.1080608@de.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

Il 23/09/2014 10:06, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> Yes. Davids explanation also makes sense as a commit message. Paolo,
> if you use David patch with a better description of the "why" I am
> fine with this patch.

Done, thanks everybody!

Paolo