From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kvm-s390: Provide guest TOD Clock Get/Set Controls Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:54:28 +0100 Message-ID: <545A3A24.6030000@redhat.com> References: <1414424654-21946-1-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1414424654-21946-2-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5459F6E0.8080400@suse.de> <545A17EF.4090004@de.ibm.com> <545A2209.9010603@redhat.com> <545A34F7.7050400@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52727 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753191AbaKEOyo (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 09:54:44 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm1yr-0006hl-4G for kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:54:41 +0100 Received: from net-37-117-142-149.cust.vodafonedsl.it ([37.117.142.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:54:41 +0100 Received: from pbonzini by net-37-117-142-149.cust.vodafonedsl.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:54:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <545A34F7.7050400@suse.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/11/2014 15:32, Alexander Graf wrote: > > Of course 2 has code written, but it should be a small change to use > > ONEREG instead. What do you think? > > How far does the existing nanosecond number get us until we hit the > 64bit limit? 2042. > And by the time we hit it, wouldn't we hit it on x86 as well? No, because x86 counts up since boot. Paolo