From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kvm-s390: Provide guest TOD Clock Get/Set Controls Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:45:43 +0100 Message-ID: <545A7E67.5020507@redhat.com> References: <1414424654-21946-1-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1414424654-21946-2-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5459F6E0.8080400@suse.de> <545A17EF.4090004@de.ibm.com> <545A2209.9010603@redhat.com> <545A54FA.5040802@de.ibm.com> <545A604C.3010202@suse.de> <545A64DB.6000100@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christian Borntraeger , Alexander Graf , "Jason J. Herne" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:60275 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbaKETps (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:45:48 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r20so1025254wiv.3 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:45:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <545A64DB.6000100@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/11/2014 18:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> > >> > Whether you want to follow that approach or do it as VM attribute >> > straight away, I don't mind much :). > given that top programmable field and epoch are available as ONEREG, lets do the same for TOD. Is the epoch per-cpu? Paolo