From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: kvm: arm: vgic: Process the failure case when kvm_register_device_ops() fails Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:30:34 +0000 Message-ID: <5464CE9A.6050209@arm.com> References: <5464C865.90504@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "christoffer.dall@linaro.org" , "gleb@kernel.org" , Paolo Bonzini , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Chen Gang Return-path: Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:52812 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933378AbaKMPak convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:30:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5464C865.90504@gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13/11/14 15:04, Chen Gang wrote: > When kvm_register_device_ops() fails, also need call free_percpu_irq() > just like others have down within kvm_vgic_hyp_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang > --- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > index 3aaca49..b799f17 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > @@ -2470,8 +2470,14 @@ int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void) > > on_each_cpu(vgic_init_maintenance_interrupt, NULL, 1); > > - return kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops, > - KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2); > + ret = kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops, > + KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2); > + if (ret) { > + kvm_err("Cannot register device ops\n"); > + goto out_free_irq; > + } > + > + return 0; > > out_free_irq: > free_percpu_irq(vgic->maint_irq, kvm_get_running_vcpus()); > Awesome. You're now freeing a per-cpu interrupt after just after having enabled it on all CPUs. What could possibly go wrong? M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...