public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: increase user memory slots to 509
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:53:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54661758.5080707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141114151030.75f588bd@igors-macbook-pro.local>

On 14/11/2014 15:10, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:23:58 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> It would use more memory, and some loops are now becoming more
>> expensive.  In general adding a memory slot to a VM is not cheap, and
>> I question the wisdom of having 256 hotplug memory slots.  But the
>> slowdown mostly would only happen if you actually _use_ those memory
>> slots, so it is not a blocker for this patch.
> It might be useful to have a big amount of slots for big guests
> and although linux works with minimum section 128Mb but Windows memory
> hotplug works just fine even with page-sized slots so when unplug in
> QEMU is implemented it would be possible to drop balooning driver at
> least there.

I think for a big (64G?) guest it doesn't make much sense anyway to
balloon at a granularity that is less than 1G or even more.  So I like
the idea of dropping ballooning in favor of memory hotplug for big guests.

> And providing that memslots could be allocated during runtime when guest
> programs devices or maps roms (i.e. no fail path), I don't see a way
> to fix it in QEMU (i.e. avoid abort when limit is reached).
> Hence an attempt to bump memslots limit to 512, where current 125
> are reserved for initial memory mappings and passthrough devices 
> 256 goes to hotplug memory slots and leaves us 128 free slots for
> future expansion.
> 
> To see what would be affected by large amount of slots I played with
> perf a bit and the biggest hotspot offender with large amount of
> memslots was:
> 
>  gfn_to_memslot() -> ... -> search_memslots()
> 
> I'll try to make it faster for this case so 512 memslots wouldn't
> affect guest performance.
> 
> So please consider applying this patch.

Yes, sorry for the delay---I am definitely going to apply it.

Paolo

      reply	other threads:[~2014-11-14 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-06 15:52 [PATCH] kvm: x86: increase user memory slots to 509 Igor Mammedov
2014-11-06 16:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-13 16:31   ` [PATCH] kvm: memslots: replace heap sort with insertion sort Igor Mammedov
2014-11-13 16:58     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-13 23:00       ` [PATCH v2] " Igor Mammedov
2014-11-14  9:57         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-14 10:58           ` Igor Mammedov
2014-11-14 14:10   ` [PATCH] kvm: x86: increase user memory slots to 509 Igor Mammedov
2014-11-14 14:53     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54661758.5080707@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox