From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] vgic additions for forwarded irq Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:54:36 +0000 Message-ID: <54730E6C.1040708@arm.com> References: <1416766373-13569-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <20141124105037.GL3401@cbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "eric.auger@st.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "joel.schopp@amd.com" , "kim.phillips@freescale.com" , "paulus@samba.org" , "gleb@kernel.org" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "patches@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , "a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com" , "a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com" , "john.liuli@huawei.com" , "ming.lei@canonical.com" , Eric Auger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141124105037.GL3401@cbox> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 24/11/14 10:50, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:12:49PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >> This series applies on top of "ARM: Forwarding physical >> interrupts to a guest VM" (http://lwn.net/Articles/603514/) >> series. > > Marc and Eric, > > Does it make sense to review and look at these patches given the current > state of the forwarding patches, or should we wait until Marc respins > that series? I'm still in the process of respining all of this (we've had a few iterations with tglx, but I got sidetracked with the ITS/v2m/MSI side of things). I'll get back onto this this week. Hopefully. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...