From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: APIC fixes Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:22:16 +0100 Message-ID: <547C95B8.7020300@redhat.com> References: <1417114994-25235-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , Nadav Amit To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1417114994-25235-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 27/11/2014 20:03, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote: > The interesting one is [3/4], which improves upon a previous CVE fix; > we also handle logical destination wrapping in it, so [2/4] does the > same for physical; and to make it nicer, [1/4] removes a condition. > [4/4] makes our fast path return true when the message was handled. >=20 > Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 (4): > KVM: x86: deliver phys lowest-prio > KVM: x86: fix APIC physical destination wrapping > KVM: x86: allow 256 logical x2APICs again > KVM: x86: don't retry hopeless APIC delivery >=20 > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >=20 So the order should be 1/2/5/3/4, right? Paolo