From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@kernel.org, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] assign each vcpu an owning thread and improve yielding
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:00:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547F098B.4030003@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547F07EB.4080807@redhat.com>
Am 03.12.2014 um 13:54 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
>
> On 03/12/2014 13:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> This series improves yielding on architectures that cannot disable preemption
>>> while entering the guest and makes the creating thread of a VCPU the owning
>>> thread and therefore the yield target when yielding to that VCPU.
>>>
>>> We should focus on the case creating thread == executing thread and therefore
>>> remove the complicated handling of PIDs involving synchronize_rcus.
>>>
>>> This way we can speed up the creation of VCPUs and directly yield to the
>>> executing vcpu threads.
>>>
>>> Please note that - in theory - all VCPU ioctls should be triggered from the same
>>> VCPU thread, so changing threads is not a scenario we should optimize.
>>>
>>>
>>> David Hildenbrand (2):
>>> KVM: don't check for PF_VCPU when yielding
>>> KVM: thread creating a vcpu is the owner of that vcpu
>>>
>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 22 ++--------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> would be good if you could have a look at these patches.
>
> Sure.
>
> I think patch 1 is fine and I am applying it. For patch 2, what about
> moving the ->pid assignment in the KVM_RUN case of kvm_vcpu_ioctl?
That was my initial patch for the rcu specific latencies (do you remember?) But IMHO patch 2 is actually the proper thing to do, no?
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-25 16:04 [PATCH RFC 0/2] assign each vcpu an owning thread and improve yielding David Hildenbrand
2014-11-25 16:04 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: don't check for PF_VCPU when yielding David Hildenbrand
2014-11-26 7:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-26 9:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-11-26 9:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-28 10:08 ` Raghavendra KT
2014-11-28 10:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-28 11:40 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-12-01 9:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-12-03 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-03 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-03 13:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-11-25 16:04 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: thread creating a vcpu is the owner of that vcpu David Hildenbrand
2014-11-26 7:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-03 12:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-03 12:12 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] assign each vcpu an owning thread and improve yielding David Hildenbrand
2014-12-03 12:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-03 13:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2014-12-03 13:00 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2014-12-03 13:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547F098B.4030003@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).