From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Stupid Xen vs KVM question
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 08:29:54 +0100
Message-ID: <54815EF2.4030808@redhat.com>
References: <CALCETrUQfzqtVzE8GV2yRkzyiWzVfzL-FL8FzTRXJQiFSXhk+w@mail.gmail.com> <20141205022420.GA27661@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:37123 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752451AbaLEHaC (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Dec 2014 02:30:02 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so463482wiv.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 23:30:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141205022420.GA27661@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 05/12/2014 03:24, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> We could do a simple thing - which is that the paravirt_enabled
> could have the value 1 for Xen and 2 for KVM. The assembler logic
> would be inverted and just check for 1. I am not going to attempt
> to write the assembler code :-)

Wouldn't Xen HVM also want to be 2?

Paolo