From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] KVM: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration (v2) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:10:19 +0100 Message-ID: <54887E7B.4060308@redhat.com> References: <20141210170601.674935761@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Rik van Riel , Radim Krcmar To: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48338 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932209AbaLJRpq (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:45:46 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBAHjgOV022771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:45:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141210170601.674935761@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/12/2014 18:06, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > See patches for details. Difference between v1 and v2? Please fix your workflow. Paolo