Re: [PATCH/RFC] s390/kernel: use stnsm instead of stosm

[Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>]

Paolo,


sorry, should have only go to Martin and Heiko. 
Nothing to worry about from your side. :-)


Am 16.12.2014 um 10:30 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> At least on z196 stnsm is faster than stosm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/irqflags.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/irqflags.h
> index 37b9091..16aa0c7 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/irqflags.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/irqflags.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static inline notrace void __arch_local_irq_ssm(unsigned long flags)
> 
>  static inline notrace unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>  {
> -	return __arch_local_irq_stosm(0x00);
> +	return __arch_local_irq_stnsm(0xff);
>  }
> 
>  static inline notrace unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
>