From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
Cc: <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <helgaas@kernel.org>,
<wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>, <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
<zhipingz@meta.com>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
<wangyushan12@huawei.com>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 13/18] vfio/pci: Introduce VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH family uapi for PCI TPH control
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 19:56:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548acc4a-c9c2-458e-8f0a-0822f7a7c2ab@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708173101.236cd0b9@shazbot.org>
Hi Alex,
On 7/9/2026 7:31 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 20:42:19 +0800
> Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Add user API definitions for PCI TPH device feature set, including three
>> feature IDs:
>> - VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH: Global TPH enable and capability query
>> - VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_RESOLVE: Resolve PH/ST from specified source
>> (GET only)
>> - VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_ST: Batch program ST table entries (SET only)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> index 5de618a3a5ee..ed04b6280cd6 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> @@ -1534,6 +1534,68 @@ struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf {
>> */
>> #define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_MIG_PRECOPY_INFOv2 12
>>
>> +/* PCIe TPH device feature definitions for VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE ioctl */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH 13
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_RESOLVE 14
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_ST 15
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH - Control and query PCI TPH capabilities
>> + *
>> + * SET: Opt-in to TPH feature; flags must be zero.
>
> We clearly need to define what it actually means to opt-in, as this
> series is not implementing it as it should be defined. The user needs
> to opt-in via this feature before we modify the device ABI in any way.
> The extent to which the user may enable TPH features is bound both by
> the device capabilities and the module parameters set by the system
> admin.
I will add full documentation describing the mandatory opt-in rule: users
must call SET on this feature before any TPH virtualization or TPH_RESOLVE/
TPH_ST ioctl access is allowed. Without opt-in, TPH config space registers
remain raw read-only and related TPH feature ioctls return -ENOTSUPP.
Also clarify the dual capability bound: exposed TPH functions are limited by
both hardware native TPH capability and host-wide tph module policy.
>
>> + * GET: Return supported TPH capability bits in flags.
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_device_feature_tph {
>> + __u32 flags;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Capability bits returned by GET on VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_CAP_DMABUF (1u << 0) /* DMABUF sources resolvable */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_CAP_CPU (1u << 1) /* CPU sources resolvable via _DSM */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_CAP_LITERAL (1u << 2) /* LITERAL ST source supported */
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_RESOLVE - Resolve PH/ST tag value from source
>> + * Note: GET only
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_device_feature_tph_resolve {
>> + __u32 flags; /* IN: source type + namespace modifiers */
>> + __u32 src; /* IN: dma-buf fd or CPU ID based on flags */
>> + __u8 valid; /* OUT: bitmap indicating valid output fields */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_VALID_PH (1u << 0) /* ph holds valid processing hint */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_VALID_ST (1u << 1) /* st holds valid steering tag */
>> + __u8 ph; /* OUT: TPH processing hint */
>> + __u16 st; /* OUT: raw steering tag value */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_ST - Batch program architected ST table entries
>> + * Return value: number of successfully written entries
>> + * Note: SET only
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_device_feature_tph_st {
>> + __u32 flags; /* IN: source type + namespace modifiers */
>> + __u16 start; /* IN: first ST table index / MSI-X vector */
>> + __u16 count; /* IN: number of contiguous entries to program */
>> + __aligned_u64 dests; /* IN: user pointer to array of source u32 values */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Common flags shared by TPH_RESOLVE and TPH_ST features */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_NONE (1u << 0) /* TPH_ST only: set ST=0 */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_DMABUF (1u << 1) /* src = dma-buf fd */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_CPU_VOLATILE (1u << 2) /* src = volatile memory CPU ID */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_CPU_PERSISTENT (1u << 3) /* src = persistent memory CPU ID */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_LITERAL (1u << 4) /* TPH_ST only: src = raw literal ST */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_EXTENDED (1u << 30) /* Use extended 16-bit ST namespace */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_REQUIRE_ST (1u << 31) /* TPH_ST only: fail if resolved ST=0 */
>
> I don't see the value in jumping to the end of the flags field for
> these last two. Adding DMABUF is a good change from the proposal, but
> I wouldn't go out of our way to try to preserve some grouping of source
> flags from modifiers.
I will move VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_EXTENDED and VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_REQUIRE_ST down
from bits 30/31 to lower unused positions, remove artificial separation
between source-type flags and modifier flags for cleaner grouping.
>
> We also seem to have avoided any statement or decision to what extent
> our uAPI is defined by the current implementation. Particularly the
> ordering of TPH_ST versus manipulating the control bits in config space
> are entirely undefined here.
>
> We're also not addressing that the TPH_ST policy counters the overall
> feature policy to return 0/-errno and not updating the documentation to
> bring that to the forefront. Thanks,
Two undefined behaviors will be explicitly documented:
- Execution order and priority between VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH_ST batch
programming and direct userspace writes to TPH_CTRL config registers;
- Error return rules when requested operation exceeds current tph_policy
level (Literal mode blocked under policy <= 2 returns -ENOTSUPP).
Both will be fix in v20.
Thanks
>
> Alex
>
>> +
>> +/* Mask for mutually exclusive source type bits, only one may be set */
>> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_MASK (VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_NONE | \
>> + VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_DMABUF | \
>> + VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_CPU_VOLATILE | \
>> + VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_CPU_PERSISTENT | \
>> + VFIO_DEVICE_TPH_SRC_LITERAL)
>> +
>> /* -------- API for Type1 VFIO IOMMU -------- */
>>
>> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 12:42 [PATCH v19 00/18] vfio/pci: Add PCIe TPH support Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 01/18] PCI/TPH: Fix pcie_tph_get_st_table_loc() field extraction Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 02/18] PCI/TPH: Fix tph_enabled concurrent update race by bitfield packing Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 03/18] PCI/TPH: Cache TPH requester capability at probe time Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 04/18] PCI/TPH: Refactor pcie_enable_tph & add explicit requester variant Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 23:33 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 9:22 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 05/18] PCI/TPH: Refactor pcie_tph_get_cpu_st & add explicit variant Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 06/18] PCI/TPH: Expose the enabled TPH requester type Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 23:33 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 9:30 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 07/18] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_supported() helper to check TPH capability attributes Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 0:39 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:32 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 9:36 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 08/18] PCI/TPH: Add pci_tph_dsm_supported() helper to detect device TPH ST _DSM Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 09/18] vfio/pci: Hide TPH capability when TPH is unsupported Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 0:36 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:32 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 11:00 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 10/18] vfio/pci: Introduce tph policy parameter for staged TPH feature enablement Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 23:31 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 11:29 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 11/18] vfio/pci: Virtualize PCIe TPH capability registers Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 0:51 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:31 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 11:40 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 12/18] vfio/pci: Add dmabuf TPH metadata storage and fd query helper Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 0:53 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:31 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 11:49 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-09 18:50 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 13/18] vfio/pci: Introduce VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH family uapi for PCI TPH control Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 0:57 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:31 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 11:56 ` fengchengwen [this message]
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 14/18] vfio/pci: Implement VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_TPH and valid TPH config write support Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 1:16 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:30 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 12:16 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 15/18] vfio/pci: Implement TPH_RESOLVE feature for DMABUF and CPU source resolving Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 1:26 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:31 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 12:20 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 16/18] vfio/pci: Implement TPH_ST feature for batch ST table programming Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 1:42 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-08 23:29 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 12:36 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-09 13:49 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 17/18] vfio/pci: Reset hardware TPH state on device enable/disable Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 13:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 23:29 ` Alex Williamson
2026-07-09 12:39 ` fengchengwen
2026-07-02 12:42 ` [PATCH v19 18/18] vfio/pci: Expose tph_policy via debugfs Chengwen Feng
2026-07-02 12:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548acc4a-c9c2-458e-8f0a-0822f7a7c2ab@huawei.com \
--to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyushan12@huawei.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=zhipingz@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox