From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: powernv: Return to cpu offline loop when finished in KVM guest Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 23:56:30 +0100 Message-ID: <5497501E.9040806@suse.de> References: <20141203034840.GA612@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> <878ui13xbe.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Schwab , Paul Mackerras Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48388 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752581AbaLUW4e (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Dec 2014 17:56:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878ui13xbe.fsf@igel.home> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21.12.14 15:13, Andreas Schwab wrote: > arch/powerpc/kvm/built-in.o: In function `kvm_no_guest': > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o:(.text+0x724): undefined reference to `power7_wakeup_loss' Ugh. We just removed support for 970 HV mode, but that obviously doesn't mean you can't compile in support for HV mode without enabling p7. Paul, what would you think of a patch that makes BOOK3S_HV depend on PPC_POWERNV? Alex