From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] x86, vdso, pvclock: Cleanups and speedups
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:30:01 +0100
Message-ID: <54992809.7040605@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1419295081.git.luto@amacapital.net> <549917F6.1080504@redhat.com> <CALCETrUtf=a9wRYwftJxNB6Smrf0pXS43qPd37XO0_mxrGJ-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	glommer@gmail.com
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUtf=a9wRYwftJxNB6Smrf0pXS43qPd37XO0_mxrGJ-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org



On 23/12/2014 09:16, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Any thoughts as to whether it should be tagged for stable?  I haven't
> looked closely enough at the old pvclock code or the generated code to
> have much of an opinion there.  It'll be a big speedup for non-pvclock
> users at least.

Yes, please.

Paolo