From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/xen: allow privcmd hypercalls to be preempted on 64-bit Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:01:18 +0000 Message-ID: <54C761EE.6070507@citrix.com> References: <1422323467-16713-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1422323467-16713-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <54C75BD60200007800059BDD@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Borislav Petkov , , Luis Rodriguez , , , , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Masami Hiramatsu , , Thomas Gleixner , , To: Jan Beulich , , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54C75BD60200007800059BDD@mail.emea.novell.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 27/01/15 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 27.01.15 at 02:51, wrote: > Even if David told you this would be acceptable, I have to question > an abstract model of fixing issues on only 64-bit kernels - this may > be acceptable for distro purposes, but seems hardly the right > approach for upstream. If 32-bit ones are to become deliberately > broken, the XEN config option should become dependent on !X86_32. There are still legitimate reasons to prefer 32bit PV guests over 64bit ones. Previous versions of this patch had 32bit support as well. Why did you drop it? ~Andrew