From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: s390: fixes and features for kvm/next (3.20) Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:03:02 +0100 Message-ID: <54D21886.8090001@redhat.com> References: <1423043092-34044-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , linux-s390 , Alexander Graf To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:34238 "EHLO mail-we0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932530AbbBDNDI (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:03:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1423043092-34044-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/02/2015 10:44, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > here is my remaining bunch of patches for 3.20 for review. All patches > have been in linux-next via > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git next > (well a tiny fix went in today, so the commit id for the last 3 patches > has changed) > > I think it makes sense to give some of these patches some more days > for external review. Is it ok to send a pull request early next week > or do you want it before 3.19? No problem, I have been a bit late myself so I don't plan to send a 3.20 pull request earlier than Wednesday or Thursday. Paolo