From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: s390/CPACF: Choose crypto control block format
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 14:48:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D22319.4010009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D2191C.9000604@de.ibm.com>
On 04/02/2015 14:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> >
>> > Could this also be part of the "things" that KVM can choose to enable,
>> > even though it's not a facility?
> Can you re-ask that question? Not sure what you want to know.
>
> This is mostly a fixup for z13, which wants to have a bigger control block. but
> this block is not guest visible.
Okay, this is what I was asking. If the block is not guest visible
that's fine.
What happens if the guest executes PQAP(QCI)?
Paolo
> Talking about key wrapping, this is actually masked via a facility bit (for MSA-3
> and MSA-4), therefore we have the test_vfacility thing in that function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 9:44 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: s390: fixes and features for kvm/next (3.20) Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: floating irqs: fix user triggerable endless loop Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: s390: reenable LPP facility Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 12:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 14:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 3/7] s390/kernel: Update /proc/sysinfo file with Extended Name and UUID Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 12:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 13:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 13:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 19:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-05 11:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: s390/CPACF: Choose crypto control block format Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 13:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-04 13:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 13:48 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-02-04 14:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: s390: use facilities and cpu_id per KVM Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: s390: add cpu model support Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: s390: Create ioctl for Getting/Setting guest storage keys Christian Borntraeger
2015-02-04 13:03 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: s390: fixes and features for kvm/next (3.20) Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D22319.4010009@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).