From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] x86/xen: add xen hypercall preemption
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:47:15 +0000
Message-ID: <54D36653.7010207@citrix.com>
References: <1422323467-16713-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
	<david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1422323467-16713-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 27/01/15 01:51, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
> 
> This v5 nukes tracing as David said it was useless, it also
> only adds support for 64-bit as its the only thing I can test,
> and slightly modifies the documentation in code as to why we
> want this. The no krobe thing is left in place as I haven't
> heard confirmation its kosher to remove it.

FYI, I went back an reviewed my last v4 patch and folded the
xen_end_upcall() change into it instead.

http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-02/msg00682.html

This will be easier for arm/arm64 to make use of in the future since
there are fewer arch-specific changes.

David