kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	A
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:03:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D4F3D2.3010807@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwhf0iCKDzv-CiC7qMYa9x8C9keRCUDkXu6KLb8sXsC2w@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/06/2015 07:15 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can we modify it slightly to avoid potentially accessing invalid memory:
> 
> So I think there's a race with that.
> 
> And I'll warn you: the kernel does do speculative reads of memory that
> might be invalid, not just in places like this. See the comment in
> get_user_huge_page() for example, where we knowingly do speculative
> reads, but hide it if DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set.
> 
> More commonly, CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS is very much about doing
> speculative reads. Now, that access is hidden inside an asm, so KASan
> won't see it, but there might well be others.
> 
> You probably don't see them very much just because they are so rarely
> a problem, and most of the time it's not to other processes stack but
> to allocated structures where freeing takes long enough to basically
> hide any small race..
> 
> In other words: I suspect it would be good to instead just teach KASan
> about "this is a speculative read" and just suppress the warning for
> those instead.
> 

We can suppress warnings by wrapping such speculative reads with
kasan_disable_current()/kasan_enable_current() calls.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-06 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-06 14:49 [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 15:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 16:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 17:03     ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2015-02-08 17:14   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-06 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 19:42   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 21:15     ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 23:24       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-08 17:49   ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 18:57 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-08 17:57   ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-09  9:34   ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 12:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 12:52       ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10  0:53       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-10  9:30         ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 13:18           ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:20             ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 14:24             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 13:23           ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-10 13:26           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11  1:18             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 17:24               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 23:15                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 23:28                   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-12  7:08                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-12 14:18                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 11:08             ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 17:38               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 18:38                 ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54D4F3D2.3010807@samsung.com \
    --to=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).