From: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
A
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:03:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54D4F3D2.3010807@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwhf0iCKDzv-CiC7qMYa9x8C9keRCUDkXu6KLb8sXsC2w@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/06/2015 07:15 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can we modify it slightly to avoid potentially accessing invalid memory:
>
> So I think there's a race with that.
>
> And I'll warn you: the kernel does do speculative reads of memory that
> might be invalid, not just in places like this. See the comment in
> get_user_huge_page() for example, where we knowingly do speculative
> reads, but hide it if DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set.
>
> More commonly, CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS is very much about doing
> speculative reads. Now, that access is hidden inside an asm, so KASan
> won't see it, but there might well be others.
>
> You probably don't see them very much just because they are so rarely
> a problem, and most of the time it's not to other processes stack but
> to allocated structures where freeing takes long enough to basically
> hide any small race..
>
> In other words: I suspect it would be good to instead just teach KASan
> about "this is a speculative read" and just suppress the warning for
> those instead.
>
We can suppress warnings by wrapping such speculative reads with
kasan_disable_current()/kasan_enable_current() calls.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-06 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 14:49 [PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 15:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 17:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2015-02-08 17:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-06 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-06 19:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-06 21:15 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-06 23:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-08 17:49 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-06 18:57 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-08 17:57 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-08 21:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-09 9:34 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-09 12:52 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 0:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-10 9:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-10 13:18 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 13:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-02-10 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-10 13:23 ` Sasha Levin
2015-02-10 13:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 1:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 23:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-11 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-02-12 7:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2015-02-12 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 11:08 ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-11 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-11 18:38 ` Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54D4F3D2.3010807@samsung.com \
--to=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).