From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] cpu-model/s390: Add cpu class initialization routines Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:02:42 -0800 Message-ID: <54E75AA2.9070503@twiddle.net> References: <1424183053-4310-1-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1424183053-4310-11-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , Alexander Graf , Christian Borntraeger , "Jason J. Herne" , Cornelia Huck , Paolo Bonzini , Andreas Faerber To: Michael Mueller , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1424183053-4310-11-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/17/2015 06:24 AM, Michael Mueller wrote: > +/** > + * s390_test_facility - test if given facility bit is set facility list > + * of given cpu class > + * @class: address of cpu class to test > + * @nr: bit number to test > + * > + * Returns: true in case it is set > + * false in case it is not set > + */ > +bool s390_test_facility(S390CPUClass *cc, unsigned long nr) > +{ > + if (cc) { > + return test_facility(nr, cc->fac_list) ? true : false; > + } > + return false; > +} Where do you see this being used? r~