public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@amd.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "Bandan Das" <bsd@redhat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: svm: make wbinvd faster
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:58:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F4969B.8080806@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302160319.GA25123@potion.brq.redhat.com>


On 03/02/2015 10:03 AM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2015-03-02 10:25-0500, Bandan Das:
>> Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> writes:
>>> 2015-03-01 21:29-0500, Bandan Das:
>>>> Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@amd.com> writes:
>>>>> +static int wbinvd_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	kvm_emulate_wbinvd(&svm->vcpu);
>>>>> +	skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
>>>>> +	return 1;
>>>>> +}
>>>> Can't we merge this to kvm_emulate_wbinvd, and just call that function
>>>> directly for both vmx and svm ?
>>> kvm_emulate_wbinvd() lives in x86.c and skip_emulated_instruction() is
>>> from svm.c/vmx.c:  so we'd have to create a new x86 op and change the
>>> emulator code as well ... it's probably better like this.
>> There's already one - kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction
> My bad, its usage is inconsistent and I only looked at two close
> interceptions where it was used ... kvm_emulate_cpuid() calls
> kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction(), while kvm_emulate_halt() and
> kvm_emulate_hypercall() need an external skip.
>
> We do "skip" the instruction with kvm_emulate(), so automatically
> skipping the instruction on kvm_emulate_*() makes sense:
>   1. rename kvm_emulate_halt() and kvm_emulate_wbinvd() to accommodate
>      callers that don't want to skip
>   2. introduce kvm_emulate_{halt,wbinvd}() and move the skip to to
>      kvm_emulate_{halt,wbinvd,hypercall}()
>
> The alternative is to remove kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction():
>   1. remove skip from kvm_emulate_cpuid() and modify callers
>   2. move kvm_complete_insn_gp to a header file and use
>      skip_emulated_instruction directly
>   3. remove unused kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction()
>
> Which one do you prefer?
I prefer renaming them,  ie kvm_emulate_wbinvd_noskip(), and making the 
existing ones, ie kvm_emulate_wbinvd() call the noskip verion and add a 
skip similar to how wbinvd_interception above does.  I can send out a 
patch later today with that rework.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-02 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-28  0:19 [PATCH] x86: svm: make wbinvd faster Joel Schopp
2015-03-02  2:29 ` Bandan Das
2015-03-02 13:59   ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-02 15:25     ` Bandan Das
2015-03-02 16:03       ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-02 16:58         ` Joel Schopp [this message]
2015-03-02 14:09 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-09 23:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-10 11:01   ` Radim Krčmář
2015-03-10 22:37     ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F4969B.8080806@amd.com \
    --to=joel.schopp@amd.com \
    --cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox