From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
"christoffer.dall@linaro.org" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com"
<n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com>,
"eric.auger@linaro.org" <eric.auger@linaro.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: mark kvm->buses as empty once they were destroyed
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:09:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5512EBB9.2050304@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427126309-11223-7-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
On 23/03/15 15:58, Andre Przywara wrote:
> In kvm_destroy_vm() we call kvm_io_bus_destroy() pretty early,
> especially before calling kvm_arch_destroy_vm(). To avoid
> unregistering devices from the already destroyed bus, let's mark
> the bus with NULL to let other users know it has been destroyed
> already.
> This avoids a crash on a VM shutdown with the VGIC using the
> kvm_io_bus later (the unregistering is in there to be able to roll
> back a faulting init).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
That seems sensible, but I don't see why nobody else hits that. What are
we doing differently?
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Paolo, Marcelo, can we have your Ack on this?
Thanks,
M.
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 8c7ab0b..6f164eb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -604,8 +604,10 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> list_del(&kvm->vm_list);
> spin_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> kvm_free_irq_routing(kvm);
> - for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++) {
> kvm_io_bus_destroy(kvm->buses[i]);
> + kvm->buses[i] = NULL;
> + }
> kvm_coalesced_mmio_free(kvm);
> #if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)
> mmu_notifier_unregister(&kvm->mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
>
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 15:58 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm/arm64: move VGIC MMIO to kvm_io_bus Andre Przywara
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: Redesign kvm_io_bus_ API to pass VCPU structure to the callbacks Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 16:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: move iodev.h from virt/kvm/ to include/kvm Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-25 21:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm/arm64: remove now unneeded include directory from Makefile Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: x86: " Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-25 21:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm/arm64: rename struct kvm_mmio_range to vgic_io_range Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: mark kvm->buses as empty once they were destroyed Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-03-25 21:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-26 12:41 ` Andre Przywara
2015-03-27 1:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2015-03-27 2:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm/arm64: simplify vgic_find_range() and callers Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm/arm64: implement kvm_io_bus MMIO handling for the VGIC Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm/arm64: prepare GICv2 emulation to be handled by kvm_io_bus Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm/arm64: prepare GICv3 emulation to use kvm_io_bus MMIO handling Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm/arm64: rework MMIO abort handling to use KVM MMIO bus Andre Przywara
2015-03-23 21:43 ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2015-03-24 16:03 ` [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: fix MMIO handling on userland induced accesses Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm/arm64: remove now obsolete VGIC specific MMIO handling code Andre Przywara
2015-03-25 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-27 9:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-03-23 21:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm/arm64: move VGIC MMIO to kvm_io_bus Nikolay Nikolaev
2015-03-24 10:10 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5512EBB9.2050304@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox