From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm/arm64: merge GICv3 RD_base and SGI_base register frames Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:14:07 +0000 Message-ID: <5514A0CF.80907@arm.com> References: <1427380778-942-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1427380778-942-10-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20150326215308.74b994ff@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Marcelo Tosatti , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" To: Marc Zyngier Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150326215308.74b994ff@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 03/26/2015 09:53 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:39:36 +0000 > Andre Przywara wrote: > >> Currently we handle the redistributor registers in two separate MMIO >> regions, one for the overall behaviour and SPIs and one for the >> SGIs/PPIs. That latter forces the creation of _two_ KVM I/O bus >> devices for each redistributor. >> Since the spec mandates those two pages to be contigious, we could as >> well merge them and save the churn with the second KVM I/O bus device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > > I wonder why we didn't have it that way the first place... Me too ;-) > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier Thanks! Andre.