From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: x86: Add support for local interrupt requests from userspace Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 22:10:22 +0200 Message-ID: <55871A2E.7070900@redhat.com> References: <1433289107-20638-1-git-send-email-srutherford@google.com> <1433289107-20638-4-git-send-email-srutherford@google.com> <556ECB0D.2060709@redhat.com> <20150620004142.GA12037@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Rutherford Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59673 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751526AbbFUUKZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:10:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150620004142.GA12037@google.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20/06/2015 02:41, Steve Rutherford wrote: > Pinging this thread. > > Should I go with skipping the round trip, and combining > KVM_REQUEST_PIC_INJECTION with the KVM_INTERRUPT (a VCPU IOCTL)? > [It's currently a VM IOCTL, which seems reasonable, given that the > PIC is a per VM device. When skipping the round trip, a VCPU Ioctl > seems sensible, given that an interrupt is associated with a specific > CPU.] Yes, please. Sorry for not answering, I didn't understand a question was implied. The roundtrip can be done in userspace. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in