From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com, jroedel@suse.de,
ogerlitz@mellanox.com, amirv@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: count number of assigned devices
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:36:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559BF203.2010202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436282525.1391.42.camel@redhat.com>
On 07/07/2015 17:22, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> > -#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_NONCOHERENT_DMA
>> > +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VFIO_HOOKS
> Do we really want to tie these two things together under something
> that's not strictly a "vfio" option? Legacy assignment also makes use
> of these, as shown in this patch, but even if we consider that temporary
> until legacy assignment is removed, I can imagine platforms that might
> care about one but not the other. I don't really see the harm in using
> a separate #define, perhaps __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_ASSIGNED_DEVICE. Thanks,
Sure, that's okay.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 13:45 [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: full virtualization of guest MTRR Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: count number of assigned devices Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 15:22 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-07 15:36 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: SVM: use NPT page attributes Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-08 5:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-08 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09 2:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-09 15:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-10 1:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-10 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-10 16:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-17 0:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 2:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: SVM: Sync g_pat with guest-written PAT value Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: apply guest MTRR virtualization on host reserved pages Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 14:06 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: full virtualization of guest MTRR Joerg Roedel
2015-07-07 14:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-07 14:14 ` Joerg Roedel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-08 15:18 [RFC/RFT PATCH v3 " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-08 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: count number of assigned devices Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-08 15:29 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559BF203.2010202@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).