kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:59:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559E29C4.6000208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jpgy4iqi85i.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy>



On 09/07/2015 00:42, Bandan Das wrote:
> 
> If a Linux guest is assigned more memory than is supported
> by the host processor, the guest is unable to boot. That
> is expected, however, there's no message indicating the user
> what went wrong. This change prints a message to stderr if
> KVM has the corresponding capability.
> 
> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>

This is not entirely correct, because it doesn't take the PCI hole into
account.

Perhaps KVM could simply hide memory above the limit (i.e. treat it as
MMIO), and the BIOS could remove RAM above the limit from the e820
memory map?

Paolo

> ---
>  linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
>  target-i386/kvm.c         | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> index 3bac873..6afad49 100644
> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -817,6 +817,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
>  #define KVM_CAP_DISABLE_QUIRKS 116
>  #define KVM_CAP_X86_SMM 117
>  #define KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE 118
> +#define KVM_CAP_PHY_ADDR_WIDTH 119
>  
>  #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>  
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 066d03d..66e3448 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -892,6 +892,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>      uint64_t shadow_mem;
>      int ret;
>      struct utsname utsname;
> +    int max_phys_bits;
>  
>      ret = kvm_get_supported_msrs(s);
>      if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -945,6 +946,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +    max_phys_bits = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PHY_ADDR_WIDTH);
> +    if (max_phys_bits && (1ULL << max_phys_bits) <= ram_size)
> +        fprintf(stderr, "Warning: The amount of memory assigned to the guest "
> +            "is more than that supported by the host CPU(s). Guest may be unstable.\n");
> +
>      if (kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_X86_SMM)) {
>          smram_machine_done.notify = register_smram_listener;
>          qemu_add_machine_init_done_notifier(&smram_machine_done);
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-09  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-08 22:42 [PATCH] target-i386: Sanity check host processor physical address width Bandan Das
2015-07-09  7:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  9:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 10:03     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 19:11       ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 19:30         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09  7:59 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-09  8:26   ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-09 13:04     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-09 19:22       ` Bandan Das
2015-07-09 12:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2015-07-09 19:25   ` Bandan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559E29C4.6000208@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).